Dutch Republic DBQ Essay Sample free essay sample

In the seventeenth century. the Dutch Republic experienced a Aureate Age and was able to keep security. integrity. and prosperity in its society and economic system. The state was considered a taking power. particularly in trade and thoughts. within Europe. However. it was non long earlier fortunes changed and the province face many jobs set uping peace and understanding. By the terminal of the 17th and the beginning of the eighteenth centuries. there had been a important alteration in the Dutch Republic’s power. for multiple factors and grounds. From 1650 to 1713. non merely external factors such as European intercession and British trading competition. but besides internal division damaged the Dutch Republic and challenged its authorization as a great power. European states. sometimes in united attempt. tried and succeeded in doing the Dutch jobs. The tabular array exposing the figure of seized ships during the Angle-Dutch Wars is a clear illustration of this challenge that the Dutch had to face ( physician. 3 ) . By looking at the tabular array. it is apparent that into the late seventeenth century. the British were exceling the Dutch. which was bit by bit losing security in non lone Numberss. but besides in high quality as a naval power. In 1671. the Dutch decided to turn to the turning job. uncovering through the Amsterdam City Council their sentiments that their adjacent states were so aiming their trade and power ( physician. 7 ) . This implied how there was a united European attempt to dispute the Dutch. and the metropolis council. as the highest decision-making authorization in the Dutch Republic. could come this dependable decision. because they were straight involved in the nation’s trading personal businesss and could right analyse the state of affairs. Because of this. the council showed how the Dutch were genuinely threatened by the remainder of Europe. This menace seemed to hold made its impact. as the national debt is shown to hold increased more than three-fold from 1688 to 1713 ( physician. 12 ) . This may hold been because of the Dutch’s need to keep its ground forces against France. which causes the navy to lose power against the British and the debt to increase. The debt. a direct conse quence of struggle with other states. supports that external influence—that caused revenue enhancements and bad economy—greatly harmed the Dutch. The English occupant who lived in the Dutch Republic straight strengthens this statement by exemplifying the direct. seeable effects of war ( physician. 14 ) . Because he experienced and straight saw the battles of the people. he was able to give dependable grounds when he stated that as a consequence of the War of Spanish Succession. many work forces died. go forthing widows. orphans. and others enduring. This straight connects Dutch adversity with a war in Europe. therefore implying that the latter caused the former. However. the Dutch Republic did non face challenges merely at the political. diplomatic degree. but besides at the economic degree. Trading competition against the progressively powerful British caused decrease in Dutch trade. harming its economic system and place as a European power. The first and 2nd presented map and diagram reflect this gradual alteration over the seventeenth century. When the map. which shows early booming Dutch trade and struggle against the British ( physician. 1 ) . is compared with the saloon graph. which shows the ulterior diminution in the Baltic Sea Trade ( physician. 2 ) . it possible to see that the naval conflicts against the British resulted in the diminution in trade. and the diminution in economic system besides. Marquis de Pomponne farther expressed this thought in her study to the Gallic authorities. when she said how trade competition between the two states caused struggle and Dutch anxiousness ( physician. 11 ) . Her illustration suggested that English and Dutch trading struggle decidedly caused the Dutch problem. Because she was a foreign. Gallic embassador to the Dutch Republic. prefering neither the Dutch nor the British. she was able to give an indifferent. true history of the state of affairs. uncovering the destabilized Dutch economic system. Finally. a Dutch colonial administer about makes certain the correlativity between addition in British trade and lessening in Dutch trade. by acknowledging that English. every bit good as other European. trade can non be challenged or overcome by the neglecting Dutch East India Company ( physician. 13 ) . Sing that the colonial decision maker. who is able to actively detect and be involved in trade. is himself acknowledging his ain country’s failing. it is evident how serious the harm on Dutch trade is. Furthermore. more British trade allowed for the Bank of England to be strengthened and supply more dependable loans that the Dutch can. This causes London to replace Amsterdam as the new fiscal centre. further leting better trade for the British. The devastation of Dutch commercialism managed to change its economic system and prosperity. but internal issues besides played a portion in harming the state every bit good. Division and inequality between the Dutch states and within society led to Dutch inability to contend and prolong itself. These internal defects are revealed in Sir Downing’s missive to the English authorities in 1664. which stated that Dutch provinces other than Holland were all hapless. shattered. and divided ( physician. 4 ) . He reveals how the Dutch Republic was challenged in its integrity and security because of this internal struggle. Furthermore. more societal tensenesss are revealed in an anon. booklet published in 1669 in Holland. which expressed the desires and sentiments of unsated merchandisers. As the voice of merchandiser category. the booklet demanded for low revenue enhancements. continued trade. peace. protection. and no war. Because the merchandisers themselves wrote the booklet. it straight revealed their sentiments and the possible struggle they faced within society that reduced Dutch power. This societal division is shown to hold harmful effects. as the Dutch authorities study said how distrust and dissension between states and within the Dutch Republic led to its inability to support itself. Lack of integrity within the state damaged its power and security. As a powerful authorization involved in its state’s issues. the authorities was able to uncover the tense divisions between the states. the challenge it presented to the nation’s integrity and ability to contend Gallic onslaughts. and an of import cause of Dutch insecurity and disunity. The jobs of the Dutch Republic at a more specific degree are stated in the Amsterdam booklet of 1683. which addressed the broad spread between the hapless and the rich in society and implied the discontent of the hapless. During this clip. the on the job category. being much less comfortable than the powerful merchandiser category. could non vie against them in concern within the state. so the hapless frequently invested in British financess. which proved to be another factor that harmed Dutch prosperity and societal cooperation. These struggles within society besides challenged its ability to defy foreign menaces or onslaughts. During the seventeenth century until the early eighteenth century. the Dutch Republic underwent drastic alterations in its power and stableness. Over the class of less than a century. the state bit by bit lost power due to rival European states. trading competition. and besides internal disunity. The Dutch Golden Age was over and the state was no longer among the most powerful European states ; nevertheless. this was non the lone displacement in European power that occurred during this clip. By 1713. the Peace of Utrecht had ended the War of Spanish Succession. and the distribution of power among European states had wholly been transformed.